Is home ground flour “Processed Food?”

Cookies

 

At a end-of-semester Christmas party in college, the kind where everyone brings in something to share, one girl in that class brought in cookies.  She looked almost apologetic when she announced, “I know that not everyone is going to like these cookies.  They are made from a non-fat recipe.”  I consider myself an adventurous person (not like Adam Richman level of adventurous), so with the belief that I had never once meet a cookie that I did not like, I took one and ate it.

 

That was the day that I met a cookie that I did not like.  Some things belong in cookies, like fat for instance.  And other foods in nature belong with all of their accessories as well—like the wheat berry.

 

Chaya the beautiful

 

Baking is both science and art.  Believe me, Chaya is an artist in the kitchen with bread baking—and no two batches are the exact same.  Now compare homemade bread (with flour that you ground in your kitchen) to store bought bread.  Trust me, I could never go back to store bought bread; it lacks soul.

 

Whenever possible use whole grain products, ideally stone-ground.  Whole grain flours are nutritionally superior, plus they have more flavor.  “White” wheat flour has the “good stuff” taken out—the bran, wheat germ and “shorts” are removed; then to get the “bleached flour” the flour is treated with such things as oxides of chlorine, acetone peroxide, potassium bromate, nitrogen, nitrosyl chloride, chorine dioxide, benzoyl peroxide, azodicarbonamide, plaster of Paris, or ascorbic acid to whiten and “mature” the flour, rendering a “more tender final product in baking” (Mitchell, 1991).

 

Okay, let us dive right in here.  Can you call home ground flour, “processed food?”  I am going to say, “No and Yes.”

 

White Bread

 

“No,” in that home ground flour is nearly orthogonal to the stuff you find in the bread aisle at the grocery store.  That “bread” is not bread that you could produce in your house because you probably do not have Phosphorus in your kitchen cupboard.  Phosphorus makes incendiary products and tracer ammunition possible, but is not an ingredient in our go-to bread recipe at our house.  It may be a stretch to call that “bread” bread at all because real flour (the kind you grind at home) goes rancid at about the same rate as milk if you leave it on the counter.  This is a problem for bread companies to bake it, transport it and have it meet up with consumers in the grocery store at the height of its freshness.  So the more calcium sulfate you add to your bread, the more “processed” it becomes on the real food continuum.  However, you can also add calcium sulfate as a soil amendment or use it to comprise plaster or sheetrock—the possibilities are endless.

 

“For example, sometimes a recipe ends up needing to be modified with a little extra calcium sulfate or flavoring to balance acidity.  Whatever it might take in Wayne [New Jersey], it would be a big challenge to the Twinkie bakery” (Ettlinger, 2007).

 

Real Bread

 

“Yes,” in that it alters the wheat from the form you find it in nature.  I do not digest raw hops really well, but I love beer.  Raw meat is not my thing, but I do enjoy a grilled steak.  In the same way, flour baked into bread is a “process” that our house employs to derive nutrition from a wheat berry that would be plain roughage if swallowed whole.

 

A home use grain mill, like the Wondermill for example, is giving you a product that is 100% usable.  Since most of our bread that we bake is derived from wheat flour, we are able to use 100% of the flour from 100% of the wheat berries put into the mill.  The wheat berry comes in three main parts: the bran, the germ and the endosperm.

 

Anatomy of a wheat berry

 

The bran is the wrapper that encases the wheat berry and keeps it sealed.  The germ is the engine that starts the wheat plant when it germinates.  The endosperm is the starch, or to the germ it is the fuel that powers the wheat plant until it can absorb the nutrients from the soil and metabolize the suns energy.  Just like the fat in likeable cookies, the bran and the germ are part of the wheat package.  Since you pay for the whole wheat berry, why not eat all of it?

 

It turns out that commercial flour strips the bran and the germ out because these are the parts that will go rancid.  Rancid flour does not sell.  However the bran and the germ can be sold as cattle feed.  So the bread you buy in the store is not nearly as complete in nutrition as what is in the manger.

 

Most of today’s mass-produced foods are seriously depleted of nutrients and are highly chemicalized with additives. Processed foods today are not just more sophisticated and more convenient versions of the foods eaten by our ancestors. A wide spectrum of essential nutrients has been removed in the manufacturing process. The basic molecular structure of what remains is also degraded and nutritionally inferior.  Until recently, grains were ground between large stones to make flour. Everything in the original grain remained in the finished product, including the germ, the fiber, the starch, and a wide spectrum of vitamins and minerals. The final product contained all the naturally occurring vitamins, minerals and micronutrients (Cranton, 2011).

So if it is not nutrition that we are buying, what exactly are we paying for?  Answer: Convenience.

 

“We do not need unhealthy foods to be more convenient or less expensive” (Pino, 2011).

 

Oh, but they indeed are both more convenient and less expensive—hence the appeal.  You may remember the old food pyramid:

 

old USDA food pyramid

 

Now here is the new one:

 

new USDA food pyramid

 

Guess what the USDA is asking you to eat more of?  What appears first in each pyramid—you guessed it grains.  Where do most people get them?  Already ground, stripped, baked and value-added-ready-to-eat on the shelf.

 

I can remember that when good homemade baked bread was a regularity in our house, we all felt much better after dumping the mass-produced bread in the store.  Getting off the cheap starch is the one truly effective resolution that can change your life for the much better this week!  Blood sugar spikes, inflammation of every kind all are effects of being on cheap starch.  There is nothing wrong with fructose when it comes from fruit (eaten in moderation).  When you amplify a good thing like fructose with another good thing like corn you can get a bad thing like high fructose corn syrup.

 

So how can you tell which source of grains are best?  The answer is complex.  Not that the answer is difficult to understand, the answer is complex carbohydrates should make up any carbohydrates taken in at all.

 

Simple and complex carbs are the two main forms of carbs. Carbohydrates provide the body with its main source of energy. . . . Simple carbs are single- or double-linked sugar molecules, and complex carbohydrates are three or more linked sugar molecules, according to MedlinePlus. Simple carb foods usually come from fruits, table sugars and dairy products. Complex carbs commonly come from starchy vegetables and whole grain breads and cereals. The energy from simple carbs is used faster by the body while complex carbs last longer because they are made up of more sugar molecules than simple carbs (Gulezian, 14 ).

Carbohydrates that give us energy also are what fuels the plant to grow initially.  The body is an incredibly well designed machine, that needs high octane quality fuel—do not put the cheap stuff in your body.

Interested in more about bread?  Check out some of our other bread blogs:

Blog – Homemade Bread Recipe–Pantry Paratus Style

Blog – Whole Wheat vs. Hole Wheat

Blog – What I Put Into My Bread–The “Why”

Blog – Altitude Baking & Bread Recipe

Blog – Basics of Breadbaking–An Interview with Chaya’s Mentor

 

 

Wilson

Pro Deo & Patria

 

Photo Credits:

Grain by ml1gU02

Cookies by n49fTlI

first Bread by mgid8Bm

second Bread by nfAVg1Y

anatomy of a wheat kernel

old USDA food pyramid

new USDA food pyramid

 

 

Citations:

 

Mitchell, P. (1991). Grist mill quick loaf breads. (p. 3). Chatham: Sims-Mitchell House.

 

Ettlinger, S. (2007). Twinkie, deconstructed, my journey to discover how the ingredients found in processed foods are grown, mined (yes, mined), and manipulated into what America eats. (p. 84). London: Hudson st Pr.

 

Cranton, E. M. (2011, March 15). Modern bread, the broken staff of life [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://www.drcranton.com/nutrition/bread.htm

 

Pino, D. (2011, August 31). Why sliced bread was never a great invention. Retrieved from http://summertomato.com/truth-and-marketing-why-sliced-bread-was-never-a-great-invention/

 

Gulezian, T. (14 , July 2011). [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://www.livestrong.com/article/293310-high-complex-carbohydrate-diet/

Demystifying Processed Food

“The last three decades have seen tremendous growth in sales of processed food—sales now total $3.2 trillion, or about three-fourths of the total world food sales” (Regmi & Gehlhar, 2005).

Assuming that anyone reading this blog has heard the admonition to eat healthier at least once in their lifetime, it can probably be assumed as well that you should cut out “processed foods.”  How can you tell if something is a processed food or not?  Being able to know that difference is significant when you consider that three of the four bites of food sold is “processed” according to the above USDA quote.

Furthermore, the studies are in to show that the industrialized societies who choose to industrialize their food supply as well, have industrial sized health problems to go along with the data trends.

[As] people in developing countries become better off, they acquire more stable resources and change the way the eat.  They inevitably replace the grains and beans in their diets with the foods obtained from animal sources.  They buy more meat, more sweet foods and more processed foods; they eat more meals prepared by others.  Soon they eat more food in general.  They start gaining weight, become overweight, and then develop heart disease, diabetes, and other chronic diseases so common in industrialized societies.  Here we have the great irony of modern nutrition: at a time when hundreds of millions of people do not have enough to eat, hundreds of millions more are eating too much and are overweight or obese.  Today, except in the very poorest countries, more people are overweight than underweight.  (Nestle, 2005)

 

Trout

 

Some working definitions for processed foods cover anything done to the food that would change its state as found in nature.  Hmmmmm, so a trout that was swimming in the stream that is currently in my hand (i.e. no longer swimming) might be called “processed?”  Answer: no, not really.    “Most every food eaten by humans is processed, altered from its form found in nature. Processing includes chopping, slicing, salting, seasoning, mashing, grinding, shelling, separating, mixing, peeling, bleaching, drying, Pasteurizing, fermenting, filleting, gutting, butchering, baking, cooking… you get the idea.” (Colon, 2010).   Public service announcement: conspicuous by its absence from the above list—irradiation.

USDA Chart for SupermarketsThe best way that I have found to triangulate on what constitutes “processed food” is asking the question, “Where did you get it?”  If the answer is, “from the tree/plant/bush that produced it,” or “I hunted/raised-then-butchered it,” or “from a farm stand,” then chances are it is not processed, and you can pronounce everything on the ingredients label.  If you answered, “from the grocery store” then the answer becomes more nuanced.

 

The last decade has witnessed an unprecedented growth in supermarkets among developing countries, particularly in Asia and Latin America where rising income levels have increased consumer demand for many higher valued processed food products. The trend has led to increasing centralization of distribution networks and also closer geographical integration (Regmi & Gehlhar, 2005).

 

We follow Summer Tomato on twitter, and I think that she has the right take on proper sustenance.  Furthermore, I like on her posts because she is an actual food scientist.  Whether it is the low-carb diet plans, Paleo diet plans or real food practices will all generally advise you to shop for your food  on the perimeter of the grocery store, because it is different than the items that you find on the inside.  If it comes in a box, can or bag it is going to be processed unless we are talking about something like brown rice (which may still be subject to irradiation).  The fresh produce section would be “unprocessed” foods, but may still contain waxes or “bud nip” (Chlorpropham).

 

Chlorpropham

 

Fresh cuts of meat, also unprocessed, have a high chance of being CAFO products or fortified with pink slime.  Dairy in the form of milk is most-definitely processed assuming that it is pasteurized, ditto for cheese.  The exception to the perimeter rule would be the bakery section—not all bread is baked equal.  We will cover this in part two in the next blog.

 

Bread

 

It becomes hard to eat healthy and to un-tether from processed foods.  Luckily, the USDA came up with a further distinction to bring clarity here for us; the term is called, “land-based.”  If that is new to you, this link may (or may not) be helpful.

 

Living things depend on formerly living things to survive, just as forests are built on decaying forests.  Food is raw energy that every living thing needs to ingest and metabolize in order to live.  As it turns out the best way to train your consumer eye to spot processed foods is to study the genuine article.  The man who is arguably the most famous for attempting to classify the reasons why some people are healthy and some are not based on demographics and geography (branch of medicine called epidemiology) was a dentist from Cleveland, Ohio named Dr. Weston A. Price.  Dr. Price took sabbatical to travel to the remote corners of the world looking for correlating factors (some say that epidemiology cannot prove causation) for healthy people.  All results pointed back to the fuel that the people took into their bodies via their “traditional diets.”  Here are eleven succinct correlations between healthy people (and teeth—he was a dentist after all) and the unprocessed foods that they ate:

 

Characteristics of Traditional Diets

1. The diets of healthy, nonindustrialized peoples contain no refined or denatured foods or ingredients, such as refined sugar or high fructose corn syrup; white flour; canned foods; pasteurized, homogenized, skim or lowfat milk; refined or hydrogenated vegetable oils; protein powders; artificial vitamins; or toxic additives and colorings.

2. All traditional cultures consume some sort of animal food, such as fish and shellfish; land and water fowl; land and sea mammals; eggs; milk and milk products; reptiles; and insects. The whole animal is consumed­–muscle meat, organs, bones and fat, with the organ meats and fats preferred.

3. The diets of healthy, nonindustrialized peoples contain at least four times the minerals and water-soluble vitamins, and TEN times the fat-soluble vitamins found in animal fats (vitamin A, vitamin D and vitamin K2–Price’s “Activator X”) as the average American diet.

4. All traditional cultures cooked some of their food but all consumed a portion of their animal foods raw.

5. Primitive and traditional diets have a high content of food enzymes and beneficial bacteria from lacto-fermented vegetables, fruits, beverages, dairy products, meats and condiments.

6. Seeds, grains and nuts are soaked, sprouted, fermented or naturally leavened to neutralize naturally occurring anti-nutrients such as enzyme inhibitors, tannins and phytic acid.

7. Total fat content of traditional diets varies from 30 percent to 80 percent of calories but only about 4 percent of calories come from polyunsaturated oils naturally occurring in grains, legumes, nuts, fish, animal fats and vegetables. The balance of fat calories is in the form of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids.

8. Traditional diets contain nearly equal amounts of omega-6 and omega-3 essential fatty acids.

9. All traditional diets contain some salt.

10. All traditional cultures make use of animal bones, usually in the form of gelatin-rich bone broths.

11. Traditional cultures make provisions for the health of future generations by providing special nutrient-rich animal foods for parents-to-be, pregnant women and growing children; by proper spacing of children; and by teaching the principles of right diet to the young.

(Cowan, 2000)

Sushi

 

It seems that some of the points above defy outmoded diet trends: low fat diets, eggs/red meat/salt will kill you, etc.  Moreover, bacteria (point #5 above) is necessary to healthy bodies.  It is a shame that you lose that to irradiation.

 

S. Truett Cathy Quote

 

 

Wilson

Pro Deo & Patria

 

Photo Credits:

Meat by n7gRnws

Chocolate Éclairs by mVLBLTc

Trout by mjYxRA6

USDA Supermarket Chart broken down by country taken from http://www.ers.usda.gov

Chlorpropham from EPA

Bread by mgid8Bm

Sushi by mhgn9jS

 

Citations:

Regmi, A., & Gehlhar, M. (2005, February). Processed food trade pressured by evolving global supply chains. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/February05/Features

Essay by Nestle, M. Titled: Dinner for Six Billion, which appears as the forward to the book on page 8 of: Menzel, P., & D’Aluisio, F. (2005). Hungry planet, what the world eats. (p. 8). Napa: Material World.

Colon, T. (2010). Unnatural empty junk food words. Retrieved from http://www.terrycolon.com/1features/food.html

Cowan, T. (2000, January 01). The weston a price foundation. Retrieved from http://www.westonaprice.org/basics/principles-of-healthy-diets

GMO’s and Bioethics

“Bioethics” is not likely a word I would get to use if playing Words With Friends®.  However when you write about food, something that was once living being used to fuel current living things, if you are honest about your research you eventually bump up against the subject.  Breaking the word down you get “Bio,” meaning life, and “ethics” meaning right conduct. 

 

I am merely sticking my big toe in the water here in writing on GMO’s.  If you want more information on what they are, whether they are good or not, etc. you will certainly find plenty of that content on the web.  I was looking to ask a different question, “are GMO’s ethical?” 

 

So when I passed the five volume reference set aptly named, The Encyclopedia of Bioethics (Gale Cengage Learning) in the library reference section, I thought that I had found a good source on some real scholarly articles on the implications of GMO.  Here is a short list of the topics covered under the letter “A:”

Abortion

Adoption

Advance Directives

Advertising

African Religions

 

Okay, so this is not your digested version of topics for the workplace water cooler.  “Hey Carol, how are the kids doing with school?  What do you think about Xenotransplantation?”  Rather, this is a serious scholarly reference set that retails for $850.00.  I crack the cover and look under “G” . . . nothing is listed for GMO.  I look under “M” . . . nothing.  I start to search the whole index, I still could not find anything on GMO’s in an exhaustive work on right conduct regarding life.

 

Okay, well there is always Google.  I type in “bioethics” into the search field and I come up with the top ten sites on the web.  I pick six of the websites listed.  One is a forum run by a Professor of Bioethics.  There is no mention of GMO’s.  One is a large state school talking about their bioethics studies program (no search field), and I could not find anything on GMO’s either.  So I find three other websites with a built-in search capability:

 

Search

 

Next:

 

Search 2

 

Next:

 

Search 3

 

Okay, now this is odd.  Conspicuous by its absence is the discussion on these websites of this new form of “life.”  I did find this website (below), and I plan on spending a lot more time there since they have a host of great topics.  I left something else in this cropped screen shot for those of you who like to find hidden clues. 

 

Search 4

 

Okay, so if I can take a rock and use it to pound a wooden peg for my own industrious purposes, then so be it.  But if I advance the design and put the rock on the end of a stick somehow and use additional mechanical advantage and inertia thus improving the design, then as far as I can tell, I am not crossing any lines for ethics.  But, if I take a chicken that produces 6 lbs of meat in 11 weeks and tweak the genetic code to crank out a super chicken that produces 10 lbs of meat in 8 weeks—has wrong been done?  Or if I take a strain of corn and in my lab create a frankenseed corn, does this cross an “ought not” line?  Because the innovation process can be applied to a hammer, does not mean that it is morally neutral to do it to a hen. 

 

Turns out a better discussion of life and a closer examination of the premises we use when we presuppose other conclusions is needed.  Life is intrinsically precious, and actually pretty hard to come by.  However, when you start with life already it is very persistent.  In the absence of life, you cannot have life. 

 

starting line

 

I look at a story in the Bible for a better perspective on this (i.e. Exodus 8:16-19).  Moses and Aaron are in front of the Pharaoh pleading to let the people go.  There is a sign where God commands Aaron strikes the earth with his staff and the dust turns into gnats.  The sorcerers were unable to recreate the same act through their arts calling it, “The finger of God.”  I often refer to life as “God’s trademark.” 

 

So if you cannot just have life by accident and it is intrinsically precious, but does it come with “ought” statements?  By definition, the study of bioethics would say, “Yes.”  I would definitely agree, there are most certainly “ought” statements about life—but how do arrive at them?  Answer: it depends where you start.

 

The magnitude and urgency of contemporary environmental problems—collectively known as the environmental crisis—form the mandate for environmental ethics: a reexamination of the human attitudes and values that influence the individual behavior and government policy toward nature.  The principle approaches to environmental ethics are “anthropocentrism,” or the human-centered approach; “biocentrism,” or the life centered approach; and “ecocentrism,” or the ecosystem-centered approach.  Variously related to these main currents of environmental ethics are “ecofeminism” and “deep ecology.”  Moral “pluralism” in environmental ethics urges that we endorse all of these approaches and employ any one of them as circumstances necessitate (Callicott, 2003).

 

It makes all the difference where you start.  Dr. Callicott who wrote the above statement is a very accomplished scholar in environmental ethics.  Please re-read the last sentence and ask, “are bioethics or environmental ethics wertfrei (value free)?”   Some things are indeed outside of ethics.  For example, whether someone chooses to buy the red car or the blue car is a decision that is not governed by “ought” or “ought not.”  But are living entities categorized under the same terms when they are subject to the freewill of free moral agents? 

 

fox

 

Even as a young child, I have always been appalled at the mistreatment of animals and humans—clearly “ought not” territory.  This more pointed question began to take solid shape in my head in high school when I saw this video (If you are not accustomed to listening to hard rock, the lyrics are quite weighty and can be found here).  In my adult years after hunting, fishing and butchering animals for meat I realize that nature is not sentimental, this is a human trait.  A fox eating a rabbit in nature is not transgressing moral categories, this is just how business is handled in the natural order.  Yet nature is governed by physics and chemistry, not ethics.  Humans are assigned the unique ability to be self-aware regarding life and existence. 

 

“Moral pluralism” or “relativism” is ungrounded and cannot furnish “ought” or “ought not” statements.  Moreover, the environment, life or even the human race (ecocentrism, biocentrism and anthropocentrism respectively) are not enough either since they incur intractable philosophical problems because you cannot get an “ought” from an “is,” nor can you ground an “ought” in a finite object.  So, I depart from these as a starting place to pick up the conversation again about GMO’s.  There is a universal sense of “ought” and “ought not” that comes from somewhere and is a very real intuition with people the world over.  So if we are to live, then how should we live? 

 

The best answer I have found is that God created life (Genesis 1:1), made it intrinsically valuable (Genesis 1:31) and He put the first human stewards to work in order to take care of His creation (Genesis 2:15)—and we never see that He changed His mind about that.   Somewhere along the way, “dominion” has been perverted.  The question has become “can we?,” instead of “should we?”

 

If GMO’s are not ethical, it would be a very splintered argument to say because we are “playing God.”  The same logical slippery slope can be used antagonistically to describe getting an elective surgery or taking medication, etc.  Solid ground like deriving “ought” and “ought not” statements from “thou shalt” and “thou shalt not” statements seems to be the only way to arbitrate between inevitable disagreements.  Because if two people disagree on a topic like GMO’s, one can say “I like them,” or “they work for me,” and be completely within the bounds of moral pluralism/relativism.  However, a higher critique of the same topic presupposes that life is precious and ought to be protected not exploited and asks this question, “I know that I can produce frankenseed, but should I?”

 

Life Preserver

Wilson

Pro Deo et Patria

 

Photocredits:

Corn by mifOP7i

(Screen shots are hyperlinked to their respective web domains)

Fox by mlJLfTo

Starting Line by mC2EGpq

Orange Life Preserver by ncCH4oC

 

 

Callicott, J. (2004). Environmental Ethics. In S. Post (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Bioethics (3rd ed. p. 757). New York: MacMillan Reference USA.

 

Cooking, what humanity did before irradiation was cool

This will be Part III of the topic we are discussing here: food, its source, the implications of what happens in the modern system(s) and the safety net at the end of the process, irradiation.  As Chaya mentioned in Part II, if someone was texting while driving and was completely fine with doing so because they could just count on an airbag to stop them from killing passengers, you would take notice in a big hurry. 

 

airbag

 

It is true, you can irradiate a multitude of sins and therefore abate them, but how did people eat for thousands of years before electromagnetic cure-alls? 

 

I recently passed by the title, Hungry Planet, What the World Eats, in the library (not a book we sell).  These “chance encounters” with interesting books are typically not without consequence for me.  My curiosity seems to have a hotline to my inner nerd which loves these kinds of books.  My inner nerd then has complete override for my “thrift” sense and I typically end up buying so many good books this way. 

 

In this book, written by Peter Menzel and Faith D’Aluisio, they take on the topic of what different people eat around the world, even different cultures inside of the same country.  The book is scientific in a sneaky way, so if you are not into facts and figures you can still walk away from this book with a big advantage to the comparative value from the pictures alone. 

 

I found this link on the web with a nearly complete preview of the book.  You can flip through some pages and see the people in the different settings and what they ate for that whole week.  Please keep in mind that the authors did this with 30 families in 24 countries—this is no small undertaking!

 

Try to read this blog with anthropological lenses.  People are generally going to eat what is close at hand.  If you have ever looked into the Paleo diet, you may recall that the menu choices are largely what you could pick up on your way through the woods.  Animal proteins and fats appear high on the list, beans come in below the middle and donuts and squirty cheese in a can dead last.  Local food sources means that history has not left us great Inuit recipes for coconuts and the Mayans are not known for their seal cuisine either.

 

Along the way people probably craved variety in their diets.  The earliest ledgers for business transactions may not available, but I would wager that primitive economies were based on food transactions.  “Hey, I grow potatoes.  I see that your family produces milk—can we trade some of our surplus?”  Mutually beneficial exchanges beget economies and societies had the division of labor to move beyond subsistence to development. 

 

Pineapple

 

With the advent of the merchant class, food was marketed more widely.  Today, I can have pineapple in Montana any time of the year.  Food has a usable life before it spoils and so expedients were developed to increase food consume-ability.  Cooking is a great example of such a revolution in food.  Humans do not have the teeth to rip off chunks of raw meat like a dog, nor do we have the necessary enzymes to digest grass like a cow.  To this end, some foods are deemed edible after they are cooked (i.e. raw meat, fibrous vegetables, grasses fermented into beer, etc).    

 

Treating food, plant or animal, with high heat changes it, simplifies it, so to speak, so our teeth and gut can deal with it more effectively.  In general, it transforms organic matter that, when raw, is unpleasant to eat, difficult or impossible to digest, and unhealthy or even deadly into nourishing and palatable food.  On average, chimps spend six hours a day chewing, and people (that is to say members of the cooking species) only one.  (Crosby , 2005)

 

Gathering around the table is something people have taken very seriously over the years as captured in the book Hungry Panet, What the World Eats.  Some of the weightiest customs in culture are those dealing with food.  At the dinner table we talk about topics of interest, invite our friends over to our house to eat, we contemplate our provisions with gratitude, divide labor for clean up, offer prayers before meals, etc.  Look at the activities and traditions leading up to meal time: cleaning, planting, growing, harvesting, hunting, butchering, shopping and possibly traveling.  But who wants to impress a guest with raw meat or indigestible grains?  This intractable problem was solved with cooking. 

 

“The phenomenon accelerated mightily as our ancestor learned how to increase the proportion of available organic matter that they could digest by inventing cooking” (Crosby, 2005). 

 

dinner

 

“Once humans learned to cook, everything changed. The heat in cooking breaks down the fibrous collagen in meat and the stringy fibers in plants, making chewing easier and providing the luxury of consuming way more calories in far less time. We became ‘cookavores,’ according to Harvard anthropologist Richard Wrangham” (Yoon, 2007).

 

So what does all of this activity around the dinner table have to do with irradiation?  Answer: food safety.

 

Food safety historically was one of three options: eating it fresh, cooking it or a function of food preservation through various means such as: smoking, salt curing, dehydrating, freezing (seasonally dependent), burying, fermenting, etc.  The industrial age changed many things the world over; refrigeration is the biggest thing to happen to food since fire.  Refrigerators preserve food by greatly decreasing the rate of decomposition.  Food that can last longer can be shipped further.  As foods traversed great distances, people no longer knew the producers.  With food across political boundaries, I speculate that people wanted legal teeth to protect them against negligence. 

 

In the modern day, the list of activities leading up to the family fuel stop at the table (if the opportunity is taken at all) can be limited to simply shopping or ordering out if need be.  For almost a century now, the Federal Government has taken jurisdiction over the chain of custody of the food supply from farm to fork.  Since food is produced the way it is, the variables are far too myriad to ensure that everything is safe to eat without the magic bullet of irradiation.  What does not get genetically modified or treated with antibiotics can simply be zapped. 

 

shock

 

Due to the nature of meat and its higher propensity to become spoiled quickly, irradiation does make some semblence of sense.  What I cannot understand is why is animal feed irradiated?  In nature, the longest shelf life award goes to honey, behind it would be grains and cereals (ostensibly animal feed).  So why irradiate them unless the whole food system is so skewed that the only recourse left is to nuke everything as a matter of policy.

 

As Chaya mentioned in Part I and Part II, the answer is in knowing the local farmer and supporting him/her.  Someone you know and from whom you buy food is generally not going to hide behind anonymity or perpetrate negligent food production practices that put you in danger.  This transparency in the food system is what is needed to get the system back into balance.  A sound Permaculture design is needed on the local level which can scale up from there.  This leaves a lot of room for the entrepreneurial farmer to fill needs close to home.  I can only guess, but looking at the food that the Farm Bill supports, if backyards produced more gardens instead of lawns, and cows ate more grass instead of corn, the Farm Bill would no longer be a carrot or a stick.  Food would be closer, cheaper, safer, healthier, far more transparent, taste better and would not need to be irradiated. 

 

Wilson

Pro Deo et Patria

 

 

Essay by Crosby, A. Titled: Baked, Broiled, Roasted and Fried, which appears on page 52 of:

Menzel, P., & D’Aluisio, F. (2005). Hungry planet, what the world eats. (p. 52). Napa: Material World Books. DOI: www.menzelphoto.com

 

Ibid.

 

Yoon, H. (2007, January 31). In praise of braise. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/text/s.php?sId=7061089&m=1

 

Photo Credits:

Cooking in hearth by mY3Yax8

Airbag by mlllwaW

Pineapple by n6iVOjI

Dinner by mfJ2FOw

Shock by 2dCEQse

FOTPOTUS — Foods of the Presidents of the United States

Pizza

 

Pizza in the oval office?  Sure, it has been done.  But if your tastes are more regional specific, more simplistic or even pushing the envelope for gourmet—the people want to know what are the foods of the Presidents of the United States (FOTPOTUS).

 

It turns out that of the 43 men who have served in the nation’s highest office, their tastes are as diverse as their politics.  President George H. W. Bush swore off broccoli (which is one of my favorite vegetables) claiming it as a perk of the job.  President Ronald Reagan loved Jelly Belly® jelly beans (fun fact: a special jar was designed for Air Force One so that the candy would not spill during turbulence), more specifically the black licorice flavor—so much so that he sent some on the Space Shuttle for the astronauts to enjoy in orbit.  Truth be told, that gesture would have been wasted on me (I always pick out the black licorice jelly beans)—then again NASA never responded to my application to become an astronaut either.  It turns out the President Barack Obama and I both enjoy chili, and President Bill Clinton and I would both enjoy a good cheeseburger.

 

Jelly Beans

 

History has proven that the First Ladies also have quite an influence on the food served for the first family.  First Lady Nancy Reagan was very health conscious.  In spite of the Gipper’s sweet tooth and love for Monkey Bread, she opted for simple breakfast courses.

 

Both President George Washington and President Thomas Jefferson were avid farmers at Mount Veron and Monticello respectively.  Although First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt is credited for the first (victory) garden at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, the Clintons did have an inconspicuous garden on the roof of the Whitehouse, but the most famous garden at the White House goes to First Lady Michelle Obama.  Composting, gardening, food production—I really hope that idea catches on!

 

The First Lady's Garden

 

Enough of the history lesson, here are some recipes that have been the favorites in the White House:

Barack Obama’s Chili  (A nice warm treat for a cold winter day)

George W. Bush’s Huevos Rancheros  (On my list to try soon)

Bill Clinton’s Burgers  (Mmmmmmm)

Ronald Reagan’s Monkey Bread  (It is bread—we love bread here at Pantry Paratus!  I will be trying this one soon)

Jimmy Carter’s Grits  (I grew up in New England and never heard of grits until I went to school in the South, but these would warm the heart of any Yankee)

John F. Kennedy’s Chowder  (Classically lampooned as “chowdah” I have to tip my hat to JFK on this one for loving one of my favorite soups)

Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Dogs  (FDR even served them to the Queen of England!  Must have been some good hot dogs)

Theodore Roosevelt’s Oysters (Since Teddy liked to hunt up here in Montana, I was thinking that he would be associated with a good elk recipe)

Ulysses S. Grant’s Turkeys  (never moving past “good ol’ Army chow” President Grant appointed an Army cook as White House chef)

Dwight Eisenhower’s Vegetable Soup  (evidently, it took days [plural] to make)

 

A really cool resource that I found on this topic: http://www.foodtimeline.org/presidents.html

 

 

I doubt that I will ever be able to meet a President of the United States (POTUS) in my lifetime, it is good to know what kind of food fuels the top office.

 

Wilson

Pro Deo et Patria

 

 

Photo Credits:

White House Kitchen by Macon Phillips at whitehouse.gov
Pizza by mgyph6A

Jelly Beans by Bill Longshaw

First Lady’s garden by Jesse Lee at whitehouse.gov

Interview: Cathy Cromell talks Composting

 

Composting for Dummies

 

Wilson: Cathy tell us, you are a Master Gardener—how did you get into that line of work?  Did it all start off as a hobby?

 

Cathy Cromell: I grew up in a family that gardened and spent a lot of time outdoors, so a love of plants and nature is embedded in me. I have a communications degree from UCLA and my background is in publishing. When I moved to Arizona, I read a newspaper blurb about the Master Gardener program and signed up for their extensive training class to help me sort out desert gardening. It was 3 hours per week for 16 weeks, covering basics such as soil and botany; the specifics of typical landscape plants, such as cacti or citrus; and local issues, such as drip irrigation and water conserving landscapes. I started volunteering for the program, writing about a youth garden that Cooperative Extension sponsored, and my career path rambled along from there. I eventually was employed by the Master Gardener program to write, edit and publish books specific to desert gardening and landscaping. At the time, bookstore shelves were loaded with lovely options for gardening in the East, Midwest, or Northwest, which had no relevance to conditions or plant palettes in the Southwest. Career counselors always advise to “do what you love,” so the opportunity to combine writing, publishing and gardening has been terrific for me.

 

Here’s my shameless plug for the volunteer Master Gardener program. It’s available in each state, as well as some Canadian provinces, and is overseen by the Cooperative Extension Service of that state’s land-grant university. (The land-grant university is charged with public outreach, sharing useful research-based information geared to residents’ needs, in this example, gardening and landscaping.) Specifics vary locally, but university and industry experts teach courses and offer training, and in exchange, you volunteer a number of hours annually (in my experience it was 50 hours the first year, and 25 hours annually thereafter), sharing what you learned in a variety of ways with the public. According to a 2009 Extension survey, Master Gardeners donated over $100 million worth of time.

Maricopa County, AZ Master Gardner Logo

Volunteering as a Master Gardener is a wonderful way to develop friendships with other gardeners, learn from them and enjoy continuing education workshops, lectures and conferences. It’s also great for plant sharing! Here’s the national Master Gardener site link or do an internet search with your state or county Cooperative Extension office and master gardener.  http://www.extension.org/mastergardener. Okay, end of plug!

 

Wilson: No problem, that was a judicious plug!  I was stationed at Ft. Huachuca, AZ back in the early 2000’s and that is where I fell in love with the beauty of the Southwest desert.  I can only imagine how necessary it was to have someone put a voice to all of that knowledge set about growing down in that climate.  We have gotten lots of help when we first moved to Montana from a local master gardener at church.  Seek those people out and get educated!  Sharing the harvest is a proper way to say, “Thank you!” (by the way).  

 

Cornell Master Gardener Logo

 

Wilson: I look at the natural order and I consider your quote on page 9, “A single gram of soil–about the size of a navy bean–holds 100 million to 1 billion bacteria, 100,000 to 1 million fungi, 1,000 to 1 million algae, and 1,000 to 100,000 protozoa” (Cromell, 2010), and I think “Wow!”  You also talk about on page 32 of who is doing all of the work.  Do you still carry that sense of awe with you into the garden even after all of the scientific study? 

 

Cathy: Absolutely. I was enchanted by nature as a kid and still am. I think it helps that I also write profiles of gardeners for a living. Gardeners are the most entertaining, inspiring, engrossing, cheerful and downright helpful people on the planet. And generous. Admire one of their plants and they’ll start potting up an offshoot or cutting for you while you continue chatting. There are a zillion distinct passions that gardeners dive into, so I learn something useful and/or miraculous—lots of things actually—every time I talk with another gardener.

 

Wilson: It was only after I discovered Permaculture that I truly appreciated how balanced nature is.  For example, no plant-based system survives without animal input and no animal system survives without plant input.  On page 36 you mention the nemesis of the gardener–“snails and slugs.”  Would you care to comment on Bill Mollison’s quote, “You do not have an excess of slugs, you have a deficiency of ducks”?

 

Cathy: That’s both an elegant and common sense way to approach the issue, isn’t it? I recently interviewed a long-time desert dweller who remembered seeing huge 6-foot rattlesnakes on a very regular basis around his landscape back in the 1970s and 80s. Rodents and rabbits were present, too, but not a problem in numbers. As development encroached, the rattlesnake population went down, due to fear and loathing, as well as being run over by cars when their 6-foot bodies stretched across the road. Now, he very occasionally sees much smaller rattlers. Of course, the rodent and rabbit population skyrocketed, creating indignation from new residents as creatures munch on recently installed landscapes! Nature provides tidy checks and balances if we could figure out how to stay out of her way.

 

From comments I hear and questions I often get asked, it seems obvious that advertising has done a bang-up job in the last couple generations to demonize “pests.” They must be eradicated swiftly and conveniently before threatening the family! (And, in fairness, the media sometimes piles on with sensational stories about lurking creatures to grab ratings during sweeps week.) Not enough people are asking, “What is this insect/creature? Do I need to do anything about it? What are my options?” before jumping directly to, “What can I spray on this pest it to kill it?”

 

I like to share information whenever I can on Integrated Pest Management (IPM), a method that covers all available means of coping with specific pests, starting with identification and using chemicals only as a last resort. (It astounds me how many people spray chemicals around their house without knowing what the insect is, or what the chemical is.) UC Davis IPM is a good starting point for your readers throughout the West: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/. Or they can check with their local County Cooperative Extension.

 

Wilson: You are so correct about the bad rap of “pests” or “invasive species.”  I love what Toby Hemenway says about local councils organized to eradicate “invasive species” plants.  Funny, how they are often cooperating with chemical spray companies who can recognize a repeat customer when they see one.  Hmmmm . . .  What is nature’s function for the insect or plant?  What natural enemies does the plant or insect have?  Too many snakes?  Give cats a try.  In Afghanistan I saw other NATO troops keep cats around the camp so that the cats predator skills could out compete the snakes for the rodent link in the food chain.  “No mice, no snakes.” 

 

Wilson: I am pretty new to all of the science behind composting, more specifically the C:N ratio (Carbon/Nitrogen).  I had no idea that you could tune your compost pile to make it hotter.  Have you heard of Jean Pain’s work with compost hot water heaters?  Any thoughts on that?

 

Cathy: Thanks for sharing the link, I wasn’t familiar with it. It’s encouraging to me that there are people who identify a problem or issue, and then devise creative solutions that push the envelope. In the best-case scenario, their ideas can be incorporated or adapted by others in a variety of circumstances. I can return your favor and share a local example with you. Brad Lancaster lives in Tucson, Arizona, in the Sonoran desert. It’s hot and dry, obviously. City streets are paved, and existing sidewalk medians are typically barren, with very few trees lining streets as they do in some regions. All that hardscape adds to the urban heat island effect, which is rising. Although average rainfall is about 11 inches, development codes typically required that rain be shunted off residential and commercial properties as fast as possible, sending it on down the pike. Brad looks at the existing situation (Why do we waste precious rainwater? How do we get more shade to cool things off?) and over time he implements a system to retain rainwater on his property and surrounding neighborhood. Rain is channeled to soak into sidewalk medians that are now planted with desert species. The sidewalk has been transformed to provide a shady and inviting stroll, with all sorts of plant material and the urban wildlife attracted to it. Similar projects spread around the city, and Brad has become a well-known authority on rainwater harvesting, authoring two books on the subject. My description of his effort is greatly simplified, but you can find more info and photos of some of the projects at Brad’s website: http://www.harvestingrainwater.com/.

 

Wilson: Wow, any “system” designed to get rid of water as fast as possible is really in need of a reconsideration.  Permaculture would say make the water take the longest, slowest, most productive route out of the area—so that it accomplishes the most good.  Geoff Lawton describes a desert as a “flood waiting to happen.”  I really wish that more Permaculture principles were taken into consideration with municipal design.

 

Wilson: I love your quote opening chapter 5 on page 59, “Mother Nature doesn’t enclose her organic debris in containers, yet aromatic black humus–the beneficial result of her successful composting process–covers forest floors” (Cromell, 2010).  I get a real appreciation for history when I pick up a handful of humus in a forest and sift it through my fingers.  What would you tell the readers about the Permaculture principle of observing nature? 

 

Cathy: Hiking through the desert, it’s easy to spot dozens of examples of “nurse” plants. Stately saguaro and other cacti get their start in life growing in the shady canopy of desert trees such as mesquite and palo verde, which are called nurse plants. Birds sit in tree branches, leave a “deposit” that drops to the ground, and some of the seeds germinate. As the cacti mature, they grow up and through their old nannies’ canopies, no longer in need of protection. So, how does observing that natural scenario help someone grow plants in their landscape? Lots of native and desert-adapted species thrive beneath the understory of a tree where they receive sufficient light, but protection from too-intense sun, especially in summer.

Saguaro Tree

  Saguaro growing beneath the protection of a Palo Verde Tree nurse plant.

You can see mature Saguaro growing in full sunlight in the background.

 

Getting out and about in nature is invaluable in many ways, but what nature has to teach us may not be immediately obvious. For example, I don’t know that a hike in the desert will automatically help me return home and grow better vegetables! I highly recommend that people absorb the knowledge of local experts, who are generally delighted to share it. When I moved to Arizona, I learned so much, so quickly, from others that would have taken me quite a long time to figure out on my own, even though I grew up gardening and had a fair knowledge bank. (The nurse plants were explained in a class I took at Desert Botanical Garden when I first moved here.) I encourage people to check with their County Cooperative Extension office, public gardens, municipal parks and/or water conservation offices, local garden clubs, any nature related group, such as bird watchers, plant societies, hiking groups, and so on. Groups devoted to permaculture are becoming more prevalent as the concepts spread. Of course, online sites are great, too, especially for folks in rural environments.

 

Wilson: I am also a huge fan of Joel Salatin who also says the same thing about soil—it truly all starts there.  Soil is not just something to hold up the plant!  Nurse plants are one more example of nature’s efficiency.  I grew up in New England where every fall we would rake up all those “pesky” deciduous leaves.  Looking back at that now, I cringe at the wastefulness of exporting all those nutrients out of the system. 

leaves

 

Wilson: Your funny anecdote on page 105 about the softball infield benefiting from the chicken feathers really got me thinking about how many other things can be composted as opposed to sitting in a landfill.  As you studied composting, what one ingredient surprised you the most as being useful for composting? What is the average family overlooking as a common composting source?

 

Cathy: Well, basically anything that decomposes can be composted, so people should use whatever is convenient and safe for them, but funny timing with your question. Today I was on a walking path near a desert preserve and I saw enormous puffballs of cream-colored fur, like from a cat or dog. I thought, “Oh, oh, a coyote grabbed someone’s pet,” which is not uncommon here if pets are allowed to roam at night. But a few minutes later I saw a woman on the path who was vigorously brushing one of her dogs, letting the fur globs float off in the breeze. It was no doubt much tidier than brushing fuzzy dogs in the house! Pet fur and human hair both contain nitrogen, and they are two things that most people don’t think about composting. If you know a barber or pet groomer, voila!  Another really obvious source that people seem to forget is shredded documents. When shredding your personal papers to prevent identity theft, soak them in a bucket of water and add to your compost. They also make perfect worm bedding.

 

Wilson: Amazing!

 

Shredded documents, RGB Stock

Wilson: I loved chapter 10 on vermicomposting.  My wife Chaya and I did a hilarious podcast with Paul Wheaton where he retells a funny story about his vermiculture epic failure.  Are there any down sides to worms? 

 

Cathy: None whatsoever! Well, maybe a few, depending on one’s personal tolerances and where you live. If you have worms indoors, sometimes a worm or three may escape, making a run for the border, and you’ll find a little worm body in an unexpected place. Worm bins usually support some mites as part of their ecosystem, but in my experience, this is not a problem, although I live in a very arid climate. Odors can arise. However, as I explained in Composting for Dummies, potential problems are likely the human’s fault for overloading the bin with more food than the worms can eat or not balancing the essentials such as moisture and air for your region’s temperature and aridity. Just like a regular compost pile, vermicomposting systems can be managed and problems prevented by understanding the elements required and making necessary adjustments. Like Goldilocks, it may take a few attempts to get the conditions “just right.”

On another note, people may think you peculiar for keeping worms. Although, this can just as easily be considered an advantage! I used to keep my Wormingtons in a bin in the guest bathroom. The majority of people who came out had a smile on their faces and said something like, “Wow, cool, you’ve got worms in there!” If it wasn’t someone I already knew well, I could be pretty sure that they would make congenial like-minded friends. As for the other folks—with quizzical looks and scrunched up faces, asking something like, “Why are there WORMS in your BATHROOM?” I could tell I probably wouldn’t have much in common with those vermiphobes!

 

Wilson: Worms inside, cool. I love these new ideas for sequestering nutrition out from the waste stream.  My friend puts it this way, “take it to the dump or take it to the bank.”   

 

Wilson: Last question: You say on page 130, “A healthy garden starts with healthy soil.  You don’t need to worry about applying miracle elixirs or wielding new-fangled tools.  Adding compost to garden beds is the best–and easiest–thing you can do to produce a bumper crop of vegetables and bountiful bouquets of flowers.  Reread that sentence and commit it to memory!”  With the ever-rising cost of food, I envision a sea change in food production hopefully not to far away in the future.  Can you envision a paradigm shift in agriculture where people or even communities produce say 20% of their own food?  If so, in addition to composting, what would help spark that initiative into reality? 

 

Cathy: Wow, you raise a huge topic with all sorts of offshoots. As a kid, everyone on my street had a large productive vegetable garden, partly as a way to affordably feed a family, but also, I think, just because that’s what everyone knew and did. Kids learned from grandparents and parents how to plant, harvest and preserve. Compost piles were just there as part of the process, not something to be thought about in particular. Nobody needed to read a book about composting.

 

In a relatively short time frame, many drifted away from gardening for significant food production and we lost that cycle of passing information along to the next generation. I’m encouraged that growing food is on the upswing again, fueled by a variety of factors that have been well-covered elsewhere, such as health and environmental concerns about chemical use, soil depletion, and the direct and indirect costs of transporting food thousands of miles. Flavor is another factor. No wonder kids despise fruits and vegetables if they are raised on the tasteless cardboard bred for shipping and shelf life!

 

Movements such as Slow Food (http:/www.slowfood.com), Locavores (http://www.locavores.com), Community Supported Agriculture (http://www.localharvest.org/csa), chefs seeking out local food producers, and an increase in community and school gardens (www.communitygarden.org/ and www.kidsgardening.org/) help people understand their options and point the way to the paradigm shift you mention. Getting kids involved is key. We observed locally with a Cooperative Extension supported youth garden that kids who sow, tend and harvest their own veggies will consume those veggies with gusto and pleasure, and take the experience home to share with their family! I recall reading formal research that supports similar results. So how can we encourage school or children’s gardening in a widespread way? I appreciate that Michelle Obama is helping to shine a spotlight on the benefits, especially as related to nutrition, obesity and long-term health to jump start the conversation. It’s a huge issue.

On the other hand, I’ve seen development in my area swallow up significant productive agricultural land. The Phoenix area used to be covered with orange groves, but only a smattering remains. Recent news reports covered the expected spike in juice prices because of the fungicide scare related to Brazilian oranges.  Is it economically and environmentally feasible to get enough people growing citrus in their desert backyards (often inefficiently in regards to water and fertilizer use and/or productive harvest) to replace a significant portion of our better-managed but lost local orchards? I don’t have the math skills to figure that out!

There’s also been a cultural shift in how we value (or don’t) our food preparation and meal time that needs addressing—that “fast food nation” component of gulping junk food in our cars and at our desks in lieu of a slow-paced meal that includes conversation and appreciation for carefully prepared food. Wilson, I don’t have easy answers to your question but I appreciate that you raise it for discussion!

 

Wilson: Sounds like we could do a whole other interview just on that topic.  We have not even gotten to cover crops yet!  Thank you for all of the links, and the food for thought.  There is so much potential for individual contributions and plain old-fashioned backyard ingenuity. 

 

Wilson: Cathy, great book and thank you so much for stopping by.  The door is always open to you here at Pantry Paratus.  Your Composting for Dummies is not available in our store, but I would tell people to check with local independent book sellers to see if they have it in stock.  It is definitely within easy reach here on my shelf!

 

 

Click here to read Part 1 where I review the book Composting for Dummies.

 

Wilson

Pro Deo et Patria

 

 

Cromell, C., & Association, T. N. G. (2010). Composting for dummies. (p. 9). For Dummies.

Ibid. (p. 36).

Ibid. (p. 59).

Ibid. (p. 106).

Ibid. (p. 130).

Wilson’s Book Review: Composting for Dummies

In ground, on the ground, in a bin, on your counter top—if it was once living, chances are you can compost it.  There is so much great information in this little book that it will really make you want to start reclaiming so many of those “waste” items.

Counter Top Compost Keeper

Cathy Cromell definitely has the bona fides to write such a work.  Moreover, she has the correct approach to gardening by starting with the soil.  And she is in very good company when she talks about soil with the likes of Joel Salatin bucking the trend of those who advocate for “plant food.”  You know “plant food,” it comes in a bag, has a price tag so that you can put it in the shopping cart and feel good about hauling it home.

 

If you take the other course of action in building the soil first, rest assured your plants will have everything they need.  As a matter of fact if you walk into the forest, kneel down and pick up a scoop of chocolatey brown coffee-ground like soil (or humus), you are getting to see the natural order at work.  Nature seldom wastes anything and is constantly composting.  “Compost is a mixture of decayed and decaying organic matter that improves soil structure and provides nutrients for plants” (Cromell, 2010).

 

I could go on and on about specifics in this book that I liked so much.  The graphs, pictures and side bars in this book are a great means to tell the story of how nature produces topsoil.  I contacted Wiley Publishing, Inc. to get permission to reprint the following three graphics from the book to help give you the scope and expertise captured so well here.

 

1. On page 43, we see the different phases of decomposition require different organisms to accomplish that.  They each work in their own temperature range.  Amazing!  (Cromell, 2010).

Temperature Chart P. 43

 

Excerpt from Composting For Dummies®, posted with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

2. Great sidebars throughout the book.  Here is one on page 171 that I like particularly well that talks about the importance of Rhizobia bacteria.  They are the secret weapon of legumes to pull valuable nitrogen out of the air and convert it into a form that plants can use (Cromell, 2010).  The natural order is simply fascinating!

 

Fixating on Nitrogen P. 171

 

Excerpt from Composting For Dummies®, posted with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

3. The biggest and most valuable thing that I learned from the book is the Chapter 7 covering the relationship between Carbon and Nitrogen.  I knew that they were both important, but I did not know how much that they depended on each other (30:1 to be precise).  This chart on page 108 is an excerpt of just how rich with useful facts this book is.   (Cromell, 2010).

 

C-N Chart P. 108

 

Excerpt from Composting For Dummies®, posted with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

 

 

In the classic For Dummies style of top ten lists, here is Wilson’s top ten things about this book:

10. Composting is one of the least expensive hobbies that you can do (p. 15).

9. Classic 5th Wave comics throughout the book.

8. Compost takes billions of participants (primary, secondary and tertiary consumers) all working together (p. 31).

7. You can compost with children (p. 14).

6. If you can construct a container—you can compost. Failing that, you can just stack it up on the ground and you can still compost (p. 77)!

5. Compost needs 35-40% moisture.  Ants like very dry conditions and flies prefer very wet conditions—the upside is that if you like the benefits of compost (good soil) and you also like chicken, but you do not want to measure the moisture, chickens like both flies and ants (p. 73-74).

4. Compost (as a process) is extremely observable, and is a great project for science fairs and home schoolers (p. 38).

3. If done properly, compost should not smell (p.33).

2. Worms, the more you know about them the more you love them.  They actually get their own chapter (p. 149).

1. Compost happens—you can help on the time scale, but Nature is ultimately driving.

 

 

It is wintertime folks, not much gardening to be done these days.  Other than daydreaming with seed catalogues, there is not much else that can be accomplished.  The good news is that the compost process happens year round, albeit much more slowly in winter.  This book is a quick read and a great resource.

 

Please check back on Friday so that you can help me welcome the author of Composting for Dummies Cathy Cromell as she stops by to chat with us!

 

 

Wilson

 

Pro Deo et Patria

Cromell, C., & Association, T. N. G. (2010). Composting for dummies. (p. 7). For Dummies.

Ibid. (p. 43).

Ibid. (p. 171).

Ibid. (p. 108).

test

Photo Credits:

Composting for Dummies book cover, Wiley Publishing, Inc.

Humus, photo by moptop8

Leaves, photo by mHdZdfM

Recycling a glass bottle Pantry Paratus style

Convenience is pretty expensive.  The just-in-time logistics system has changed our shopping experience in the Industrialized world.  If you pick up the last bottle of ketchup on the shelf, there is no such thing as “the back room” for someone to check to see if there is more.

 

I have bargain hunting in my genetic makeup.  I come from a long line of blue-collar immigrants who worked beyond modern imagination and were determined to get ahead in this great country.   My grandmother lived through the Great Depression in a family of ten children.  Her pantry was stocked deep at any given time.  She gardened actively throughout the summer and always had food in the refrigerator.  To her credit, I would put that below the fishes and loaves miracle when you consider how many grandsons she had.  If you left her house hungry, it was your own fault.  Her basement could have been a Cool-Whip museum for all of the washed, dried, sorted and organized-by-size containers that she kept down there.

 

 

the lowly break room reject

 

 

So when I passed by this bottle in the break room at work, my upbringing kicked in and I reflexively picked it up to examine it and see what other purpose it might fulfill.  After all, the price was right—it was being thrown away.  Here is a short list:

  • Lightning bug catcher—it is winter in Montana, bummer
  • Soil sample container—see conclusion number one
  • Yellow jacket trap— see conclusion number one
  • Seed sprouter—cool
  • Head bonker—as seen on the movie, The Gods Must be Crazy
  • Food storage container—yes, my grandmother would be proud!

 

Then the idea hit me that this bottle had a capacity in fluid ounces, but how much food could it store for me?

 

Great thoughts often sneak up on you, and it eventually came to me that frozen vegetables were on sale at the local grocery store.  We dehydrate with our Excalibur 9 Tray pretty much all the time.  Bananas were on sale this week and so we have banana chips in process as I write this.

 

First of all, why glass?  As fantastic as plastic is for space exploration, medical devices or fishing line—not all food plastics are the same.  We typically reuse all of our glass jars in our house.  A spaghetti sauce jar is on a one way trip when it leaves the store.  With this experiment, I wanted to reclaim something from the waste stream that can be used for our profit.  A post-consumer glass bottle can be taken to the dump or to the bank.

 

Secondly, why fill the bottle with dehydrated food?   I have seen some interesting experiments done with commodities such as rice, oatmeal and wheat in post-consumer bottles before, and I do like the idea.  Storing food in a five gallon pail is great, but if you want oatmeal do you really want to break the seal on a five gallon pail for one or two breakfast servings?  Ditto for wheat or rice in a spaghetti sauce jar.

Oatmeal

There are lots of great posts on the internet telling you how to store water–slightly chlorinated in a two liter soda bottle under the bed is great peace of mind.  And it is mighty cheap insurance if you are in earthquake country.

 

Lastly, why frozen vegetables?  Anything that goes into the dehydrator with as much cellulose and fiber as a carrot or corn kernel needs to be blanched first.  If you are not familiar with blanching, here is a great article on it from our friend Sharon Peterson at simplycanning.com.  Basically you dip the item in boiling water to soften the outside so that you avoid “case hardening” in the dehydrator.  You would have to look long and hard to see the down side to something that is blanched (dehydrator ready), pre cut and on sale!

 

dump bag onto tray

 

Step one: wash and dry bottle.

Step two: dump frozen vegetables on dehydrator tray.

Step three: set time for dehydrator.

Step four: put dehydrated vegetables in the bottle.

Step five (optional): add oxygen absorber

 

Here are the vegetables at 12 hours:

12 hours

 

Here are the vegetables at 24 hours:

24 Hours

 

Done!

 

Later, when frozen vegetables are not on sale, you can still enjoy them in a soup or stew anytime.  They will always be on sale to you because you preserved them minus the risk of freezer burn.

 

done

 

I managed to get two one-pound bags into the bottle.  As you can see, 2 ½ pounds would have easily made it in there.  These will go on the shelf without any further cost to store them.

Check out my other blog post: The 9 Tray Excalibur Dehydrator vs. Deep Freezer–what does it really cost to store food?

 

Wilson

 

Pro Deo et Patria

 

Oatmeal Photo Credit:Sritenou  Photo id: mjMvLPM

Elk Hunting, talking shop with David Holder Part 2

ARO Logo

 

Just in case you missed part one, you can read that here.

 

Wilson: “I think that you would agree that bow hunting is so much more sporting because of the nature and effective range of the projectile.  Would you like to make a comment on the need for ‘fair chase’ in hunting?” 

David: “After hunting in Montana, other states and countries like Canada—I wish that in Montana Fish & Game would look at the situation.  But until you put yourself in the shoes of a guy hunting in Canada where a guy cannot walk fifty yards without getting lost in the thick forest, let alone get a shot at a bear.  I went up there [Canada] the most skeptical person in 2006 on a baited bear hunt, and now I found it to be one of the greatest hunts.  Is there a need to do that where I live in Montana on an elk hunt?  Absolutely not.  But I wish that hunters would look more at a case by case basis at what is going on.  I think that there are opportunities in Northwest Montana where we could have more archery only areas.  I am not for any type of hunting in an enclosure even if it is very large.”

Wilson: “I agree.  There is definite place where ethics trumps all.  Fish and Game can write regulations a foot thick, but if the ethics are not there then no law is sufficient.  Take the topic of radios, there is a definite place for them like where someone gets hurt and needs assistance from another hunter who he was not planning to see for six more hours back at the truck.  But if the same hunters with the same radios use them to say that there is a big bull coming over the hill, then that is a different matter based on the intent.  Ethics enforces the spirit of the regulation intrinsically, rather than extrinsically enforced by punitive measures.”

David: “It comes down to how we do it.  If someone is going to break the law, then they are going to do it.  Unfortunately that is what I don’t like because our regulations are so thick that every hunter somewhere along the lines has broken the law.   And if someone wanted to hold you to a fine line, then they can find something wrong with everything.  They can measure your horns that you have or if you have a rip in your jacket then say it is not a full 400 inches.  But it is about the common sense, and I have met those Game Wardens that realize that.  You can see certain things when you know good and well that there a whole group of people shooting out of the trucks on dirt roads, too near to housing or with lights at night.  Please understand, you are taking away from my kids the chance to hunt those animals ethically, and you are going to pay the price for that.”

 

David Holder 2

 

Wilson: “Let me take you back to the moment where you have released that arrow and you feel the whole range of emotions from that, what is your protocol?  What traditions do you have?”

David: “For me it starts before that.  The day that I do not get shook from shooting an animal with a bow and arrow is the day that I quit.  But, I have learned to control that to the point where it does not hit now until the moment after the arrow takes off.  Once that arrow is on its way and you see it hit its mark or maybe it does not hit where you want, the range of emotions can be wide.  I have learned from hunting with other people is that, number one, you have to be true to yourself.  Do not talk yourself into or out of something.  I have seen people who made excellent shots and you ask them, ‘Where did you hit it?’  They answer, ‘Well, I’m not sure.’ How can you not be sure?  Just because you do not find the animal within fifty yards does not mean that you lost that animal.  The fletching on the arrow can be deceptive due to lighting.  I try to mark where I shot him, and where he went.  Is the arrow in him, or did it go all the way through him?  In almost every situation I will wait thirty to forty minutes before I ever even go towards him. If I think that the animal has been gut shot, I will ask that we leave him until the next day.  That is I would rather find that animal spoiled, then spoil an animal and never find him.” 

Wilson: “Yes, I agree.”

David: “He is going to spoil no matter what.  A gut-shot animal cannot live.  The object is for you to find him and put your tag on him whether you are going to eat that meat or not.  That is your fault that you did not make the correct shot.  But to not be able to find him means that the animal is wasted and not able to help anybody.  With gut-shot elk, I will back way away.  There are some times where I will move in quickly like a liver shot (just in front of the hind quarter) and I will go after those elk within an hour.  It is something that you have to know, you just feel it.  When the bow goes off and you just know that arrow goes where it is supposed to.  It is almost as if God says, ‘Here you go.  You get one this time. I’ll help you.’  Me, I am the guy I have to sit down because I am shaking so badly after making the shot.  You have to give that animal the chance to die and give them that time to bleed—especially an arrow and how it is used to kill an animal.  There is nothing worse than pushing them, especially an elk.  An elk is unlike any other animal I hunt in that they can cover great distances and blood trails can be very, very sparse especially over two miles. 

Wilson: “That is right.  This is where that time during the off season pays off so well where you practice shooting from different positions at different yardages and elevations.  Because once you let that arrow off the string, you cannot take it back.  That is where those ethics really matter.”

 

Wilson: “Here is a question that I have always wanted to ask a professional hunter: ‘What do you occupy your mind with when you are sitting in your spot for hours at a time watching and waiting?’”

David: “I am probably a bad person to ask.  I hunt with a lot of different people who bring books, their ipod, phones or they take naps—I cannot relax.  If someone has the television on late at night, I have to watch television so that I can focus on going to sleep.  It is the same thing when I am hunting.  If we are taking a break or something, I am still watching.  I watch so many people who lose interest.  People hate hunting with me because I am not a napper.  I don’t take a break, I will move to the next spot.    What fills my mind I guess is that I am constantly thinking ‘it could happen here.’  I can envision an elk walking right up through here.  I constantly looking at my bow, repositioning and thinking if I am sitting like this then I can make the shot over here.  Take in the distances to see if they are too far or not.  That mental preparation never stops with me. 

Wilson: “Right.  Watching the wind to see that change or noticing what the birds and squirrels are doing.”

 

Will Primos

 

Wilson: “From the videos Will Primos seems like such a lively personality, what is it like being back at the hunting camp with him?” 

David: “For someone going from a $.25 diaphragm call sold in cookie jars in little packages on drug store counters to a multimillion dollar, multi-product company—Will is very grounded.  He is a very fun person to be around and he enjoys Montana maybe more than any other place (other than maybe Mississippi where he lives).  Will, I can tell you, looks forward to coming out here into the West and elk hunting.  He has had to back out on many other hunts over the years due to time constraints.  Will is not a spring chicken anymore, but one that he always makes sure that he puts in for is the Montana Elk Hunt.  He is a lot of fun.  A very faith-based person, likes to joke around and is a lot of fun to be around.  I get the rare opportunity to see Will in his working situation as well as hunting and he can draw the line and make work fun—and a pretty good elk hunter too.”

Wilson: “I noticed how he balanced both of those so well on The Truth 13 DVD where he shoots this beautiful bull, carries all that charisma and still has the ability to make the camera man feel comfortable.”

David: “And Will is who you see on camera.  That is him.  He honestly has watched Jeremiah Johnson many, many times.  That is his out.  When times get stressful he will sit down with his phone and put on that movie.” 

 

David Holder Outdoors

 

Wilson: “As a first responder professional, what can you say about safety in the back woods especially in cold weather?  Here in Montana, you can be fifteen minutes away from a potentially life threatening situation.”

David: “First off, it starts with simple things like telling people where you are going, what drainage.  Technology has come so far today that even if you do not have cell phone service, you may have service where you end up.   Sometimes that cell phone can provide a light.  Those are some of the simple things and do not rely on electronics.  I am a compass guy—I have a GPS, but I always carry a compass everywhere I go.  Also, I always carry some way of making a fire.  There are a couple of companies making some things out there that are very easy, but I still carry a candle and water-proof matches.  That way, I can get a fire started and then build upon that.  There is a 9 volt battery and steel wool or Vaseline and cotton balls, there are all kinds of things but it basically comes down to some way to make a fire, a space blanket, someway to rehydrate yourself and to stay warm.  The greatest thing that someone can do and I do not care if it is thirty or one hundred and thirty [degrees] is to stay calm.  It is the panic that gets most people.  When you start to think, ‘I need to get out of here,’ that may be what you have to do, but you are better off staying put and thinking it through.  May be you do need to move, but are you going in the right direction?  It does not hurt to backtrack as to what you were thinking and doing.  One thing that I try to teach my boys if that if you can find water—it always goes down hill.  It may take longer and be a long way around, but it will get you somewhere eventually.  I would also say that my survival pack probably does not weigh more than a pound or two.  It is worth carrying every time.  You may be thinking that we are only going to be walking two hundred yards to coyote hunt over here at the edge of this field—take the pack.  Especially here in Montana, before you know it someone may have fallen through the ice and you need to react now.”

 

Wilson: “One last question, do you have a Bull Elk bugle call set for you ring tone?”

David: “I do not, but my son does.  You know that is funny Wilson because I laugh when I hear people having them at the seminars.  Believe it or not, there are times when David Holder does not even have one in the truck—wait that is not true, there are diaphragm calls in there right now for emergency situations.  Everywhere I go I usually have a call and people usually associate me with calling animals.  That is the one place I have not gone to, my phone is for work and no animal sounds on that.” 

 

 ARO videos

 

Wilson: “David, thank you for joining us.  I really like your website, it exemplifies quality in every way—not to mention that I could easily kill a couple of hours browsing though all of the great videos and journal entries on there.  I would definitely encourage people to check it out at www.abovetherestoutdoors.com  Is there anything else that you would like to say as we finish up?”

David: “We would encourage people to stop by.  We are a new company and we have some new editors on board.  We hope to start filling it up here soon with more and more info about different outfitters, or not even guided hunts but public land hunts and how others can do those hunts.  Affordability, everything you want to know, shoes to wear, best ways to save some money, what are the hidden costs—we are going to cover everything.  We have launched our own channel on Realtree.tv and starting in July look for us on Root Sports, “Above the Rest Outdoors” it is a new show starting 9:00 Sunday morning in July.  We are very excited about everything that is going on.”

Wilson: “Thank you David.”

_____________________________________________________

Just in case you missed part one, you can read that here.

I would encourage everyone to check out the great website resource David and his family have built.  You can contact David as well by going to his contact page. 

Is it elk season yet?

Pro Deo et Patria,

Wilson

Elk Hunting, talking shop with David Holder Part 1

Professional Hunting Advice

Today I am going to be talking shop with David Holder of Above the Rest Outdoors (www.abovetherestoutdoors.com) on the topic of Elk Hunting. 

 

David, here at Pantry Paratus we are interested in all things food.  And for us here in this part of the country, “going out for food” can mean a trip to the grocery store or walking into the woods with a hunting implement. 

 

For me growing up on the East Coast of the United States, getting the opportunity to bow hunt for Elk in the Rocky Mountains was something on the order of, “Yeah, I may actually get to do that once in my lifetime—someday.”  Now that I am actually fortunate enough to live here in such a beautiful place, I often wake up and think how awesome it is to see so much game right in city limits!  

 

Wilson: “Tell us about yourself, have you always lived in NW Montana?”

David Holder: “No I actually grew up outside of Washington, DC.  I moved to Great Falls, MT when I was in my twenties.  I have now been in Montana for the last 19 years.  Great Falls was the first stop.  I took a job with the fire department and that was what led me here.   I was a bow hunter in Virginia and I was kind of in the same mindset you were in that I may want to do something like that out West someday.  When I moved out here I was amazed at how many big game animals we have to choose from.  I think we have between ten to twelve big game species to hunt just here in the state of Montana, but elk for me are probably the top of the list simply because of the calling, the interaction you have with them and trying to see if you can win at their game.  Also elk hunting is not for the faint of heart; I love a physical challenge as well as the mental battle in playing that chess game with the animal—elk hunting proved to be perfect for me. 

ARO staff

Wilson: “The first thing I notice about your website is that your whole family is involved.  So how competitive is it living in the same house with four people passionate about the same sport?  Do you have to hear about who go the biggest game animal for a whole year?”

David: “So far I have not had to deal with that because they have not passed me.  My oldest son Warren I think has shot somewhere around sixteen big game animals.  It is not so much competitive because we are all pulling for each other.  As you will see there on the website, even if I am not the shooter, a lot of times I am there running the camera.  I can tell you I am more nervous and pulling more for them to shoot something than I ever am myself.  It is something you cannot put into words as a father.  This is the part of the industry that I guess we do not understand; it is great that you got something on film to use in your next season or series.  But I am fortunate that every one of those archery kills that my son has made, I have been there to capture it on film so that he will be able to go back and look at it forever. 

Wilson: “Wow, what a legacy to leave to your sons!”

David: “Yes it is.  My wife is a full time financial advisor for Edward Jones, and she has a career of her own while still trying to get into the woods as often as she can.  So I am very, very fortunate that my whole family is into it.  Not everyone wants to go as often as I go or to some of the places that I go.  But, everyone is passionate about it at our house.  We are all thinking about elk season the day after it ends.”

 

Wilson: “What do you recommend to get children into archery at a young age, and what can be done to make the sport more appealing to women?

David: “I guess that I have a couple of answers for that.  I pass this along at all my seminars, start them early.  I mean my boys have been shooting since they were two years old.  All I did was go to Walmart or the local department store and bought a kids bow (the kind with the suction cups) and replaced the string with a real string from one of my old bows so that they can nock a real arrow.  This way they can put a real carbon shaft arrow on the string and it will stick in a target—and when they see that arrow sticking in the target, those kids are hooked!  The distance does not have to be long, just a few yards.  Also, take them on hunting trips.  Do not take them on a seven mile hike up the side of a mountain and expect them to do it.  I started with my kids in the pack and carried them up to the top of the mountain.  I think that just showing them what it is like to be outdoors, to hear the animals, they really like it.  Also, I avoided the inclement weather days with them.  You asked about getting women involved, my wife grew up in a hunting family but the women did not do that; it was more for the guys.  So, I just built upon that and started taking her along without the expectation to have to shoot anything right now, just getting her to experience the sights and sounds of the outdoors.  There is a whole lot more to hunting than just killing an animal.  The average person does not know what a grunting elk sounds like or what it is like to see an elk laying upside down with his feet in the air in a wallow—where he suspends his normal sense of security—trying to mask his scent.  I don’t care who they are, when they see that they are going to start to enjoy it and want to be a part of that.”  

 

The Truth 13 DVD

 

Wilson: “I saw it on The Truth 13 DVD and I have also heard you say that the caller and the shooter should not be co-located.  Could you explain to our readers why you want to place the caller and the shooter apart from each other?”

David: “It is a simple one statement answer.  You want to call the elk through you and not to you.  What I mean by that is, when you are trying to call an elk to you then you are not understanding or putting yourself in the situation of that wild animal.  Realize that elk do not walk up to each other and greet by shaking hands with each other.  When an elk responds to a call and he considers himself there, he is often seventy-five, one hundred, or even one hundred fifty yards away.  He lives by his nose, and he only wants to get close enough to recognize who is there.  A lot of time people will call an elk to them and he will be hung up at one hundred yards away and not be able to get him any close and wonder, ‘what did I do wrong?’  You did not do anything wrong, that elk did what he knows he should do.  But if you put your shooter up seventy-five yards forward (and your caller back) now that elk that was hung up at one hundred yards is only twenty-five yards away from the shooter.” 

Wilson: “Now you can close that gap without educating the elk.” 

David: “Right.  Don’t change anything you are doing, just add that partner.  I cannot say this enough, adding that other person does not double your chances, it increases your chance for success exponentially.”

Wilson: “I remember watching the video on your website where the wind changed noticeably when you were hunting those two young bulls.  The grass started to bend to the left from the point of view of the camera, while you were off screen to the right.  Those bulls picked up your scent and you could see their whole expression change drastically—they were out of there!”

David: “That is right.”

 

ARO video metrics

 

Wilson: “Wow, your website is so well done!  You have quite a set up there for “how to” videos.  I really like your metrics for the reviews of gear as well as outfitters.  If Santa Claus is reading this, please consider bringing a Primos bow sling to me this year.  David, did you ever think that you would be so lucky to get to do this for a living?”

David: “Actually no.  It is one of those things that grows year after year.  I got in touch with Primos about nine years ago and started doing seminars for them.  I could not believe that people were asking the guy from Virginia for help, but I immediately realize that a lot of people who had been doing it for a lot more years than I had were still unsuccessful.  I realized that a lot of it was a lack of information, misinformation, or a lack of time to get to these places.  People were afraid of the unknown—not knowing where to go, where to start.  I want to say that the largest downfall in that realm is that a lot of people will talk about calls, even buy one, but when it comes down to using it they will not for the fear that they will run everything else off.  That is the one thing I urge people to do is to use the calls.  Now, no one wants people out there blowing them incorrectly all over the place.  It takes time to learn how to use the call.  I can tell you right now from years of experience that a large part of being able to call those elk, not necessarily to call them in, is to call them so that I can move in closer to get a shot at other elk.”

Wilson: “I have heard you say that you use percussive sounds of items that you find in nature such as pounding rocks on the ground or breaking sticks.  Could you talk more about that?”     

David: “Sure.  I think that the best call on the market on the market is free—banging rocks on the ground.  I have told hundreds of people all throughout my seminars that using rocks is one of the most realistic sounds that you can throw at an animal.  This is a sound that you can use to mimic an elk so that they do not think that you are a bear walking through the woods.  It is all about injecting that realism in there along with a short cow call or muted bugle.  Often that realism in there allows me to see an elk that the average person doesn’t.  That elk may have heard another cow call or bugle from a hunter, but they probably have not heard the sound of hooves [from rocks being pounded on the ground] from a hunter.  That may be what it takes to convince that elk and allow me to get a little bit closer.”

Wilson:  “I think that your website really captures that skill and how to be a better hunter.  I can watch you do a call and practice it myself in my living room in the month of May.”

Wilson: “I noticed that your wife cites her Christian faith in her bio.  I have determined that ethics, hunting or otherwise, is completely ungrounded unless it is based in faith.  How have you been able to enrich your faith from spending so much time in the outdoors?  Do you see a connection between the two?” 

David: “Absolutely.  With all the time I spend in the woods, not so much anymore with the camera crews I am alone, but when you are up on the mountain reflection time is often.  You are constantly looking for that extra guidance.  You are looking at things that are so spectacular that you could not possibly explain them to someone else.  If you cannot look up once and awhile and say ‘thank you,’ then you are missing the whole reason for the creation.  And kind of a humorous point to that is the journal article on my website God likes Elk, which kind of sums up the whole thing.  So the next time you are riding home with your buddy wondering what went wrong, remember you are messing with one of God’s favorite creatures.  He protects them and they get by a lot of time.  The good Lord understands the constitution of the land and He even thinks of you.  It is more remarkable than a blog or even a video can capture.  You just have to realize, that it is not just about the animal.  I think that God really like Montana when he built this place—it does not get any more spectacular than some of the places we choose to hunt.”

Wilson: “Yes, indeed!  Just being out there is part of the sport.  We are very lucky to just get the opportunity to hunt such a beautiful animal in such a beautiful place.”

 

God Likes Elk

 

Wilson: “Here is a question about the mental fortitude necessary for hunting from your journal post God likes Elk, ‘What would you tell hunters to stay motivated when they get up early and go out day after day without any filled game tags to show for it?’”

David: “I did not go into details about our Arizona hunt this year, but it can happen on the first day or the last opportunity on the last day.  I had seven days of hunting planned for that trip.  Arizona is supposed to be that slam dunk draw where you are supposed to get a bull.  There a few things that people should know about that because it is not a slam dunk, it is mostly all public land.  They had not gotten much rain in three months, so they rely on water holes.  I got off the plane September 8th and it began to rain for the entire seven days.  Water holes were everywhere.  We had thunderstorms, roads were so muddy so that you could not get anywhere.”

Wilson: “I bet the animals were all bedded down tight.”

David: “We had no idea that this weather was going to happen.  Someone has to remember that when we carry a camera, we take a lot of our opportunities and flush them down the toilet right there.  You add that extra person to move.  In this particular situation it took until the last 45 minutes on the last day to fill that tag.  We had been chasing this particular herd for two days.  We managed to call one bull to us and fill that tag at 30 yards.  Do not let anyone give you the impression that it is that easy when you see it on TV or the internet.  You are seeing five minutes over five days.  You have to remind yourself that it can happen in an instant, without warning.  It is not uncommon for elk to approach without saying anything.  This is something that I have built my entire elk hunting philosophy on: the day before elk season is the greatest hunting day ever, because in your head is the perfect hunt.  You imagine yourself on a certain hill, the weather is perfect, the wind is in your face—but you have to go out there not expecting to see that.  You learn that it just takes time and experience—and knowing when to back out.  Sometimes the wind is wrong and you have to back out and come back to hunt another day.”  

 

To be continuted . . . click here to read part 2

The Problem with Self Sufficiency

We are pleased to repost (with permission) Phil’s blog today from down under talking about “The Problem of Self-Sufficiency” in the cleverest of ways.

Philarly Farm

Posted on November 21, 2011 by phil

 

I recently said to a work colleague that I was “heading down the self sufficiency path” (or words to that effect) with my farm.  He replied with a smile “Hah, that’ll never happen!”  So my workmate sees self sufficiency as a binary state, and I suspect many others do as well.

 

In an episode of the survival podcast, Jack Spirko explained concept of self-sufficiency as something measured in a percentage, whilst self reliance was something you measured in time.  So for example, if you have a certain amount of food, water, and fuel stored, you may be self-reliant for a week or a month.  On the other hand, if you have a few garden beds and perhaps some chickens, you might be 10% self sufficient.

 

The problem was that my workmate sees self sufficiency as a binary state, and I suspect many others do as well.  It’s not really surprising, given the word itself – it is a binary statement!  If an engineer built a “self supporting structure”, you would not expect that 90% of it’s load would be borne by something else!

 

When I said I was heading down that path, I was trying to impart a sense of that percentage in my phrasing; clearly in that instance, I failed miserably.  I think that the word “homesteading” is better, since it speaks more to the intent of what I’m trying to do.  The problem is that the average Australian has never heard of that word before, so it’s not much help to me.

 

I have gotten into even more trouble trying to explain my efforts as a form of superannuation (a non-fiscal 401k for any Americans out there). Neatly, before I heard Jack Spirko talk about percentages I was using those concepts to try and explain how farming was a form of superannuation… although that didn’t really go well either, since most people have very fixed views on these things.

Me: “The way I see it, my farm is a form of superannuation”
Them: “You’re better off investing in suburban real estate”
Me: “No, I don’t mean as something I can sell”
Them: “Well if you can’t sell it, how is it of any value?!”
Me: “It can produce food”
Them: “There’s no money in food”
Me: “No, I don’t mean as something I can sell”
Them: “Well if you can’t sell it, how is it of any value?!”

And so on it goes.  By my way of thinking, every percentage of “self sufficiency” I manage correlates to a certain number of dollars per week that I don’t need.  If I manage to be 50% self sufficient (from a food standpoint) then that is many hundreds of dollars per month that I don’t need to have.  This either makes my retirement sooner, or more luxurious.

 

I think the most important thing is that whatever that percentage is, it is all immune from market fluctuations: rogue traders in Singapore are not going to destroy the value of my carrots as a foodstuff.  Furthermore it can always be improved – if you are over 100% self sufficient (from a food standpoint, which is my focus), then the surplus can be sold or traded for other things.

 

None of this solves my terminology issue – I think from now on I’ll just tell everyone that I’m using the equity in my property to invest in the agricultural futures market.  It’s true, and put that way they’ll think I’m very clever.

 

 

If you liked this, drop by Phil’s blog and leave him a comment: http://www.philarly.com/2011/11/21/the-problem-with-self-sufficiency/ .

 Also, his blog has a great deal of honeybee information, if that’s something that interests you.

 

Pro Deo et Patria,

 

(Cheers!)

 

Wilson

Wilson’s Book Review: Michael Smith’s Killer Elite

“Wow!”  That may be the one word to use to sum up my reaction to reading Michael Smith’s fascinating work of America’s most elite Special Operations Forces.  If I were to expand my commentary into say, three words, I would pick: Complexity, Creativity and Resistance.

 

Starting with the failure of the EAGLE CLAW mission of 1980 and running right up to the present day (2006-2007 when the book was published), this book is a page-turner.  It is a chronicle of all of the major world conflicts that feature threats to American citizens and her interests abroad.  Take any conflict that we see today, and the chances are good that the root causes for them reach back to the 1970’s when the cast of usual suspects set things into motion.  The book covers in equal parts the fascinating job of “the shooters” and the teams that are tasked with providing the intelligence for the men executing the plan and the decision makers. 

 

The guys keeping everyone in-the-know are referred to the book as “the Activity” which is an innocuous enough sounding name for a very small team of people tasked with such an enormous, undefined and life-threatening job.  Yet despite the name, their work is truly one of a kind and can never be underestimated even though you probably never heard about them. 

 

Based largely on the successful model of the British SAS and SBS models, these American counterparts are to be commended for dealing with the enormous complexity of world conflicts, their creativity to find solutions and their diligence in meeting the resistance that they faced from the brass at home.  If you were to think of a short list of world conflicts from 1980 until now and then wonder if these guys had anything to do with the outcome of those conflicts, all your questions would be answered in shocking detail in this book.  Taking down narco drug lords?  Somali war lords?  Bringing the butchers of the Eastern Europe ethnic cleansing massacres to justice?  Finding Saddam Hussein? Yes, yes, yes and yes—but you would be floored at how the complexities of doing any of these tasks weaves a labyrinth of possibilities for failure; however these guys always get the job done.  Most notably in the more recent news (that post-dates the publishing of the book) would be the successful capture of Captain Richard Phillips at sea (with three head shots [simultaneously] from a moving ship mind you) or the successful capture of Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan—none of these scenarios mentioned are anything like each other, and yet a very small group of guys get these impossible missions done in spades. 

 

The creativity that these men show in their solutions to intractable problems is worthy of mention all on its own.  Michael Smith does not give away the store, but there are certainly things that made me pucker at how some of those details ever made it to print.  If you are someone who cheers when the good guys win, then this is a book for you.  This book most clearly shows that the conflicts are truly a battle of ideas—more on that in future blogs. 

Book CoverThe resistance that these teams had to face from the entrenched bureaucracy structure is a story all on its own.  These men were certainly not rogue come-and-go-as-they-pleased teams.  Their tradecraft and professional manner were top notch quality and yet somehow the enigma of the resistance to America having a special operations capability is very hard to believe if it were not so well documented in the book.  The specific resistance came in many ways such as putting up bureaucratic road blocks, to denying funding, to not allowing air lift assets to be released or flat out prohibiting the capability for the job to be done in an outside-the-box manner.  My summary would not be nearly as good as this first person quote (from the author) on page 130 regarding the debriefing from Beirut:

“Gentleman, we should all be embarrassed by the failure we have just struggled through.  In my mind, the consequences of failure of this nature are just as devastating as losing a major battle, especially politically.  We ought to be able to figure out that the terrorists understand better than we do the timing of the decision-making process here in Washington and the time required for launching and getting to where they have perpetrated their action.  We are the most powerful nation in the world and if we cannot give this mission the adequate priority—with dedicated lift assets—then we ought to get out of this business and quit wasting the taxpayer’s money (Smith, 2007).”

 

And less than four months later the world watched Leon Klinghofer, an American wheelchair bound passenger on the Achille Lauro, be thrown over board by terrorists as America’s best solution stood by waiting for a ride.  Fortunately the situation changed for the much better, separate systems were worked out for funding and oversight and the rest is a heroic history captured so well in this book.  The quote from President George W. Bush on page 241 highlights this paradigm shift so clearly, “The president did not talk specifically about Iraq but he did warn that the War on Terror was about to get more difficult.  ‘Inaction is not an option,’ he said.  ‘Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.’  No one had any doubt who he had in mind (Smith, 2007).”

 

Well done Gentlemen!  We salute you.

 

Wilson

 

-Pro Deo et Patria

 

Smith, M. (2007). Killer elite. (p. 130). New York: St Marten’s Press.

 

Smith, M. (2007). Killer elite. (p. 241). New York: St Marten’s Press.

 

 

 

 

 

Notes on Veteran’s Day

19 Dec 2003, I was on a plane home to the United States of America from my duty assignment in Germany.  I separated from the US Army with an honorable discharge realizing that I was entering a whole new chapter of my life.  For the better part of the last 30 days I had spent countless hours and trips to and fro playing “signature bingo” and “insomnia proofing” (attending briefings) which is collectively known as the abstract activity called “out processing.” 

 

That plane trip across the pond was a blur to me.  I believe that I chatted with a young lady about overlaps in our music collections, pets and Harry Potter for the better part of six hours as I could hardly wait to get back to the US.  My final destination was Columbus, Ohio and the airport there is relatively small.  You may know it better as the kind of airport where you exit the aircraft descend down a set of movable stairs and walk across terra firma to the terminal building.  I was back in the land of the free and the home of the brave again and I could not believe how many blessings I had yet to count. 

 

We were in a post-911 world, so Chaya (my loving wife) was waiting for me near baggage pickup as greeting someone at the gate was no longer an option.  I had been waiting for that kiss and hug from her for months! 

 

That reunion was special because I was home for Christmas.  The snow on the ground, the green lush conifers, the biting cold humidity of the Midwest—it was all so familiar and most welcome because prior to “out-processing” in Germany I was in Baghdad, Iraq. 

 Winter in Ohio after time in Iraq

Among the times in my life that were perhaps the hardest to endure, I would cite OIF (Operation Iraqi Freedom) as a threshold for a new level of difficult.  What is down in the well certainly comes up in the bucket in good times.  However in bad times that bucket goes down deeper and you really see what is on the inside of yourself.  This level of self-discovery is only possible when you are stuck without contact via internet or reliable phone communication with loved ones, mail is slower than Christmas, food is pre-packaged and certainly not plentiful, water is hot enough at room temperature to cook Top Ramen® Noodles, the weather redefines any definition you ever knew of the word “hot” (~140° F in the shade) and the routine is monotonous to put it succinctly.  But the people that I spent all those months with are to this day some of the best people I know.  I take them with me as the souvenirs of military life.  The deep level to which I admire their character is directly proportional to the harshness of the circumstances which revealed that character.  These good friends to this day collectively make up “what I miss” when I think about the Army years. 

 

Not all service members have to go to war, and so special decorations are awarded for those who do.  Anyone who raises a right hand in oath is signing a blank check to our country. This check is payable up to (and possibly including) their life.  The proper reciprocation for that transaction is respect.  This bears repeating, but we shake their hand and say, “Thank you,” stand up and put your hand over your heart when the National Anthem plays or when the flag passes you in a parade, help out spouse or family member when their loved one is deployed, etc. 

 

America is blessed with an all volunteer Armed Forces and today we honor all of them.  The men and women of the US Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Coast Guard serve (or have served) because they chose to do so on our behalf.  We owe them respect for their sacrifice. 

 

So to all of our veterans currently serving to include my cousin who just returned home from Iraq, to those who have been separated and are back in civvies as a permanent uniform—we salute you.

 

Pantry Paratus offers free shipping to all APO/FPO addresses not as a gimmick or a sale, rather as a permanent policy to say, “thank you.”

 

 

Wilson

 

Pro Deo et Patria

Wilson’s Book Review — “Survivors: A Novel of the Coming Collapse”

Wilson’s Book Review: “Survivors, A Novel of the Coming Collapse”

by James Wesley Rawles

 

I was highly anticipating this fiction novel because I enjoyed the first fiction novel Patriots by James Wesley Rawles so much.  If you are unfamiliar with James Wesley Rawles, he is the author of several books but is also perhaps more notably the editor of SurvivalBlog.com.  SurvivalBlog is chock full of practical insight, how-to’s, practical homesteading content and Godly wisdom for living the self-sufficient lifestyle. 

 

All of the James Wesley Rawles books share the same characteristic writing style which is very unique for three reasons: (1) it is highly instructive, (2) it is very descriptive of plausible fictional scenarios written in story form in the past tense, (3) and the deliberate references to faith in God.  It is important to note that Survivors was written with a contemporaneous timeline (both plots occur simultaneously) to the book Patriots.   You do not have to read (or re-read) Patriots to follow along with this book, but it would definitely help. 

 

Patriots by James Wesley, Rawles

 

 

Survivors will not disappoint on any of the three pillars of Rawles’ writing style.  There is a list in the beginning of the book of characters that appear throughout the book as the plot weaves past and present happenings into one coherent tale of the protagonist’s (Captain Andrew Laine) anything-but serendipitous journey home to New Mexico from Afghanistan.  On a personal note, the book picked up on an interesting thread in my own life as the character travels back from Afghanistan to Germany (a trip I have made personally many times). 

 

 

 

 

My top priorities for a James Bond movie always include making sure justice prevails, that the new gadget is sufficiently cool, gawking at the car and ensuring that James gets the girl at the end of the movie.  No spoilers here, but in Survivors rest assured the main character Andy does get the girl.  The plot moves along nicely and the book does cast the net wide to include a bigger audience.  For example, those who are not familiar with military colloquialisms will not get a lot of the humor and turn of phrase used in parlance; likewise the detailed love story between reappearing characters from Patriots (Ian and Blanca Doyle) in chapter 24 (“Down in Hondo”) was not geared toward me—but Chaya would like it a lot.  Other internet critics of Rawles have said that he is focused on “white Christians” (whatever that means) to the point of violating some diversity ordinance somewhere.  Survivors includes a whole range of characters, orphans, disabled veterans, widows, poor, women, children and people who are definitely not “white” (sorry but my lack of a PC vocabulary does not leave you with a better working definition of that group).  It includes all looking to live in the face of this fictional adversity as depicted in the book or on SurvivalBlog.

Survivors by James Wesley, Rawles

 

One other criticism that I heard or James Wesley Rawles Books was that it was the post-apocalyptic life of people (none of whom had children!) who must have had quite the check book to afford all of that gear before the crunch.  In Patriots when Todd Gray and his wife pick their retreat in Idaho it mentions that “they paid cash.”  That makes for a great story, but the book did lose some of its voice with me as that is just not part of my reality.  Survivors is the story of much more real people without the benefit of a trust fund who make due with ingenuity in a true “skills trumps stuff” fashion.  For example, on p. 82 you read about the recently widowed character Shelia Randall open up a small trading post/store in rural Kentucky after she and her family “bugged out.”  James Wesley Rawles also handily weaves the value of the free market throughout the book.

 

The characters in the book are believable.  For example, the brief mention of Chambers Clarke who was the undersecretary of information in the new ProvGov has this written of him, “Before the Crunch, Clarke had been a fertilizer and pesticide salesman for Mansanto Company” (Rawles, 2011).  Not that anyone is going to be a big fan of the ProvGov, but that short resume is just not helping me like Chambers Clarke one bit.  One character that I really liked (and not mentioned in the early list of characters) is the “super horse” Prieto who is indispensible in Andy’s return to New Mexico.  What I know about horses might fill up a 3” X 5” index card.  Again, here is one more of the examples of the style we see in James Wesley Rawles books of unobtrusively instructing the reader throughout the story.  The reader if he/she was not implicitly paying attention would learn a lot about morse code, firearms, horses, electronics, bartering items and even human nature erstwhile reading a great fictional novel.  For Example, p. 83 mentions the “All-American Five” shortwave radio being operated on either DC or AC, p. 124-126 is a crash course in morse code and ham radio protocol, p. 146-148 is a great treatise on the true value of silver lovingly written in a letter format from a father to his sons, p. 153-154 is a condensed retreat rules poster, p. 300 deals very truthfully with the realities of using lethal force in self defense, etc. 

 

If you are not planning on buying the book, but do pass by it in a library or pick up a friend’s copy please read chapter 20 “Tentacles,” especially if it is the only chapter you read.  Pay attention to the conversation on pp. 159-168 between Lars Laine (Andy’s brother) and L. Roy Martin.  I read that chapter four times because the truths expressed in that conversation between those two men are an absolutely fundamental treatise on human nature.  On p. 162 is my favorite quote from the whole book:

 

 

“But storage is no more than limited capital to allow people the time to grow more food” (Rawles, 2011).

 

Survivors unashamedly points to the sustaining power of faith in God summed up in the William Penn quote on p. 77, “If man is not governed by God, he will be ruled by tyrants.”  The book drives home the point that the Christian faith is fundamental for maintaining a moral compass and a sense of hope—two things that every one can use now and if things go really badly in the future.  I was very pleased to see that there are both Anabaptists and Messianic Jewish families mentioned in the story as those two faiths are represented where we live in Montana; both of which have both personally helped Chaya and I a great deal to get acclimated here.  The cadre of writers who make up the small body of preparedness catalog of literature is not very big at all, and there are differences of opinions in that group to be sure.  You are not going to get a monolithic cannon of rationality from any group of people.  For example I disagree with James Wesley Rawles on the Reformed view of free will and the elect (reference p. 300).  However, the topic of faith is so critical to me that I have to high-light this point once more by saying that those writers (like Rawles) who do mention this inescapable logic of the need for faith in their craft really are paving the right road for many reasons.  Rawles even has a page on SurvivalBlog about the importance of prayer

 

The book does close with loose ends, and I have read negative criticism elsewhere on the internet about Survivors regarding this point.  Not to worry Rawlesian readers!  JWR does plan on writing a third contemporaneous novel to form a trifecta when he releases Founders which will feature a cross country trek of two people.  I would expect all of the story’s business to be wrapped up then. 

 

Final thoughts: I liked the book by James Wesley Rawles a lot.  It is not the page-turner preparedness primer that Patriots was, but it is well worth the read and has something for everyone.  Mind the provisos and disclaimers at the beginning with a strong dose of “do not try this at home” especially when it comes to “borrowing” an F-16 to pick up a stranded loved one . . . I’m just sayin’ . . .  

 

 

Wilson

 

Pro Deo et Patria

 

 

Rawles, A. W. (2011). Survivors, a novel of the coming collapse. (p. 267). Beyond Words/Atria Books.

 

Rawles, A. W. (2011). Survivors, a novel of the coming collapse. (p. 162). Beyond Words/Atria Books.

 

Reloading large game rounds with the Troubled Shooter

Reloading Large Game Rounds

 

A Video Blog with the Troubled Shooter

 

 

Here in Montana “going out to get food” may also include taking a hunting implement into the woods to retrieve large game.  We got the basics in this video blog from the Troubled Shooter here on reloading:


 

To get your reloading done safely and properly be sure to have the proper reloading data, a reloading manual, properly sized reloading dies and your requisite reloading supplies.  Follow your instruction manual or ask an experienced person to help you. 

 

Wilson

 

Pro Deo et Patria

 

Proviso: Hunting and/or shooting sports have inherient danger.  There is nothing here that suggest that you ought to try this.  If you do choose to reload (in accordance with the laws governing your area) do so at your own risk.